The execution environment is frozen and its policy input is not. The service still works through the primary path, but one dependency only fails when the old component is finally drained away. The primary component still serves traffic, yet the retirement exercise exposes a latent dependency on what is being removed. The main path still works until the exercise finally removes the legacy dependency it had quietly relied on.
A pipeline pins the runner image (Rollout Stuck)
The execution environment is frozen and its policy input is not. The service still works through the primary path, but one dependency only fails when the old component is finally drained away. The primary component still serves traffic, yet the retirement exercise exposes a latent dependency on what is being removed. The main path still works until the exercise finally removes the legacy dependency it had quietly relied on.
- Identify the primary failure signal in the Pinned Runner, Floating Policy Bundle scenario.
- Separate visible symptoms from the underlying technical dependency.
- Describe the safest recovery path and the follow-up prevention work.
- Summarize the current impact and the last known change.
- Collect direct evidence from logs, runtime state, and configuration before changing anything.
- Separate immediate recovery from permanent prevention work.
Choose the smallest safe recovery action first, then record the prevention work that reduces repeat incidents.
No. Keep commands, logs, file names, APIs, and product names unchanged, then explain the reasoning in the selected UI language.
State the root cause, the evidence that supports it, and the safest recovery direction.
The source scenario is treated as an incident artifact. Guidance, checklist, hints, and explanations can be localized around it.