← Problem Library
K8s L5 K8S 1310 · 14 min

Grafana Agent remote_write looks connected but drops a burst of cluster metrics because its WAL sits on ephemeral storage that was rotated away during node pressure recovery

The pipeline reconnects later, yet a whole window of samples is gone because the on-node WAL disappeared during storage cleanup.

K8sPlatform ReliabilityLevel 5Pro14 min
Scenario

Metrics ingestion resumes after pressure recovery, but dashboards never fill the missing historical gap from the outage window.

What to check first
  • Identify the primary failure signal in the Remote Write Recovered but the WAL Vanished First scenario.
  • Separate visible symptoms from the underlying technical dependency.
  • Describe the safest recovery path and the follow-up prevention work.
Checking checklist
  1. Summarize the current impact and the last known change.
  2. Collect direct evidence from logs, runtime state, and configuration before changing anything.
  3. Separate immediate recovery from permanent prevention work.
Recovery and prevention

Check WAL placement and node pressure cleanup policy before tuning remote_write queues.

Questions worth viewing together
What should you verify first when Grafana Agent remote_write looks connected but drops a burst of cluster... appears?

Community-field Kubernetes problem inspired by Grafana Community threads where remote_write recovered but the WAL on ephemeral storage had already been... A recovered remote_write connection does not restore samples if the WAL disappeared first.

What usually causes Grafana Agent remote_write looks connected but drops a burst of cluster... in production?

Teams often blame backend retention when the missing gap was lost on the sender node.

What should you document after resolving Grafana Agent remote_write looks connected but drops a burst of cluster...?

Telemetry durability depends on where local WAL data lives during node pressure events.