Pods stay blocked after an egress FQDN rule is tightened even though the updated policy is visible on the node.
A Cilium FQDN policy looks updated and pods still fail because the DNS proxy keeps the old wildcard until the cache TTL outlives the policy revision
The new domain rule is present, but the proxy still evaluates traffic against the previous wildcard answer in cache.
Scenario
What to check first
- Identify the primary failure signal in the The Policy Learned the New Name and the DNS Proxy Kept Trusting the Last One It Heard scenario.
- Separate visible symptoms from the underlying technical dependency.
- Describe the safest recovery path and the follow-up prevention work.
Checking checklist
- Summarize the current impact and the last known change.
- Collect direct evidence from logs, runtime state, and configuration before changing anything.
- Separate immediate recovery from permanent prevention work.
Recovery and prevention
Compare policy revision timing and DNS proxy cache before widening egress again.
Questions worth viewing together
No. Keep commands, logs, file names, APIs, and product names unchanged, then explain the reasoning in the selected UI language.
State the root cause, the evidence that supports it, and the safest recovery direction.
The source scenario is treated as an incident artifact. Guidance, checklist, hints, and explanations can be localized around it.
Similar cases seen in the field