Some clients validate new JWTs while one edge location keeps serving the old compressed JWKS.
A JWKS rotation completes and one edge still serves stale keys because compressed variants are cached under a different surrogate key family
The fresh JWKS is published, but one compressed branch never receives the purge tied to the uncompressed surrogate family.
Scenario
What to check first
- Identify the primary failure signal in the The New Keys Reached the Edge and the Compressed Copy Kept Living Under a Different Family Name scenario.
- Separate visible symptoms from the underlying technical dependency.
- Describe the safest recovery path and the follow-up prevention work.
Checking checklist
- Summarize the current impact and the last known change.
- Collect direct evidence from logs, runtime state, and configuration before changing anything.
- Separate immediate recovery from permanent prevention work.
Recovery and prevention
Compare purge scope and content variants before reissuing tokens.
Questions worth viewing together
No. Keep commands, logs, file names, APIs, and product names unchanged, then explain the reasoning in the selected UI language.
State the root cause, the evidence that supports it, and the safest recovery direction.
The source scenario is treated as an incident artifact. Guidance, checklist, hints, and explanations can be localized around it.
Similar cases seen in the field