← Problem Library
K8s L6 K8S 060 · 28 min

HPA and PodDisruptionBudget combine to deadlock a low-replica rollout

Autoscaling and disruption control each look reasonable alone, but together they prevent the deployment from making forward progress during an update.

K8sPlatform ReliabilityLevel 6Pro28 min
Scenario

Autoscaling and disruption control each look reasonable alone, but together they prevent the deployment from making forward progress during an update.

What to check first
  • Identify the primary failure signal in the Controller Interaction scenario.
  • Separate visible symptoms from the underlying technical dependency.
  • Describe the safest recovery path and the follow-up prevention work.
Checking checklist
  1. Summarize the current impact and the last known change.
  2. Collect direct evidence from logs, runtime state, and configuration before changing anything.
  3. Separate immediate recovery from permanent prevention work.
Recovery and prevention

Choose the smallest safe recovery action first, then record the prevention work that reduces repeat incidents.

Questions worth viewing together
Should I translate commands, logs, or product names?

No. Keep commands, logs, file names, APIs, and product names unchanged, then explain the reasoning in the selected UI language.

What should the answer focus on?

State the root cause, the evidence that supports it, and the safest recovery direction.

Why can the scenario remain in the original language?

The source scenario is treated as an incident artifact. Guidance, checklist, hints, and explanations can be localized around it.